Bureaucratic attack on NHS superbugs

Futile tokenism. Cleanliness and asepsis is what is needed and they can afford neither. They can only afford an army of bureaucrats -- and bureaucratic pay comes first

Hospitals face being served with an “improvement notice” if they fail to tackle superbug infections such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile, the health watchdog announces today. Inspectors from the Healthcare Commission will carry out unannounced spot checks on 120 NHS trusts in England over the next year in an attempt to cut rates of hospital-acquired illness. Those that are found not to be up to scratch could find themselves served with an improvement notice or be put in special measures. The crack-down comes after figures which show that cases of C. diff are on the rise.

Health Protection Agency statistics released in April identified 55,681 cases of the potentially fatal bug in patients aged 65 and over in England in 2006 – an increase of 8 per cent on the number of reported cases in the previous year. The figures also revealed 1,542 cases of MRSA blood-stream infection in England between October and December 2006, down 7 per cent on the previous quarter. Despite the fall, the Government is widely expected to miss its target of halving rates of MRSA before next April.

The Healthcare Commission will use existing data on infection rates and cleanliness to identify trusts that may need help. Those not doing well will be a priority, but up to two thirds of NHS acute trusts will be checked each year as part of the programme. Their performance will be assessed against the Government’s hygiene code, which sets out 11 compulsory duties to prevent and cope with hospital superbugs. Assessment managers will visit about ten trusts a month, examining their procedures for isolating patients, hand-washing and cleaning equipment. Under the code, trusts must have specialist infection control teams and should submit regular reports to the trust board.

If the code has been breached, trusts will be given a deadline to set out an an action plan for rectifying problems. If they fail to assure the watchdog that appropriate steps have been taken, the commission will publicly issue the trust with an improvement notice. Failure to comply could end up with the Health Secretary imposing special measures on a trust and personally overseeing an improvement programme.

At present, the commission does not inspect every trust on all the Government’s core health standards. But from this year, the 20 per cent of all trusts inspected will be checked for compliance with the hygiene code. The commission is currently investigating Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust after concerns about rates of C. diffthere since 2004. Last year Stoke Mandeville Hospital, part of the Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, was criticised in a commission report after 33 people died after outbreaks there.

Anna Walker, chief executive of the commission, said: “Boards at all acute trusts must take notice: chances are you’re going to be assessed against the hygiene code, so make sure you’re ready. We don’t want to catch trusts out. We would much prefer to find that everything is in place to protect patients and the public. “The 120 assessments will be in-depth, and visits will be unannounced so that we can see the hospital in action. What we want to know is whether trusts are taking infection control seriously.”

Lord Hunt, the Health Minister, welcomed the move. “Reducing healthcare-associated infections is a top priority for the NHS and all NHS bodies have a duty to comply with the code of practice,” he said.

Source






Hospital cutbacks in Tasmania provoke rage

THOUSANDS of concerned demonstrators marched through the cold and rain at Latrobe yesterday to protest against the planned downgrade of the Mersey Hospital. Labor Braddon MHA Brenton Best was one of the estimated 2000 to express anger at the sweeping health reforms.

Mr Best's colleague Health Minister Lara Giddings, who last week pleaded with the people of the North-West to give her plan a chance, did not attend the rally. She wants to make the Mersey Hospital a dedicated hospital for minor day surgery. Under her plan, Burnie would become the emergency and acute-care centre for the North-West.

Mr Best, who has built his political career on supporting the Mersey, told the hostile crowd he would consider crossing the floor to vote against the reform. West Coast Mayor Darryl Gerrity said the promise had drawn applause. He said there was a lot of distrust of Ms Giddings in regional Tasmania, which would feel the hospital downgrades and closures the most. "We are now officially second-class citizens," he said.

He said there was anxiety on the West Coast, where the Rosebery Hospital will lose its 24-hour staffing. "There is no public transport, we can't get up (to Burnie)," Cr Gerrity said. "All we have got on the West Coast is volunteer ambulance officers."

Mersey Community Hospital support group chairman Steve Martin said yesterday's march showed the community's passion for the hospital. "It's the biggest march I think Latrobe has ever seen." He said Ms Giddings had no real plan, funding or personnel and not enough ambulances. "This will put people's lives at risk," Mr Martin said.

The State Opposition chose yesterday to air its first concerns about the reform. Opposition health spokesman Brett Whiteley said the Government had not listened to the smaller communities, such as Rosebery and Ouse. "One thing of which people can be sure is that we won't be in lock-step with Ms Giddings on absolutely everything she proposes," he said. He said Rosebery was an isolated community with dangerous roads to the nearest hospitals.

Treasurer Michael Aird said the Government had no choice but to introduce reforms, which were driven by safety and financial sustainability.

Source

***************************

For greatest efficiency, lowest cost and maximum choice, ALL hospitals and health insurance schemes should be privately owned and run -- with government-paid vouchers for the very poor and minimal regulation. Both Australia and Sweden have large private sector health systems with government reimbursement for privately-provided services so can a purely private system with some level of government reimbursement or insurance for the poor be so hard to do?

For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here. For times when blogger.com is playing up, there are mirrors of this site here and here.

***************************